A Moral Compass

I recently finished reading “The Smartest Guys in the Room,” an amazing account of the characters who were complicit in the rise and fall of Enron.   It is a page turner; I couldn’t put it down.

The authors, Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind, tell a story of how exaggeration, manipulation and obsession with the numbers, particularly stock price and quarterly earnings, were ingrained in the culture of the company long before anyone had heard of Enron.  From executive management down to the traders, all anyone at the company cared about was making money–and making it now.  If they had to fiddle with the numbers and push the limits of the rules, so be it.  If the auditors could be coerced to agree and the bankers blackmailed, they can be considered on board.  They simply did what had to be done.

I wrote about Enron nearly eight years ago just as the Enron outrage was hitting full stride.  Although the piece reads somewhat pedestrian and overly simplistic–to this day, it’s not clear any single act of Enron was  illegal–what I believed then was reinforced by what I read in the book: Enron’s corporate culture bred corruption.

Mind you, I’m no saint.  I am an unrepentant capitalist.  I make no apologies for making money during the current recession that drove people out of their jobs and homes.  And although I’ve commented that Altria Group (MO) manufactures products that kill people, I don’t find it morally reprehensible that some people choose to invest in a company that pays a 6% yield in a fairly stable business.

But I don’t cheat, lie, steal or mislead in order to make money.*  I, like most members of society, have a moral compass, that part of myself called the conscience that tells me there are some lines I cannot cross even if I can’t precisely demarcate it.  It is what enables me to realize that the rules aren’t there to be circumvented, but are there to articulate in a concrete manner the amorphous ideals that we as society hold ourselves up to.  It is what stops me from saying “just because I can, doesn’t mean I should.”

Enron lacked that sense of right and wrong that goes beyond (even within)  the written rules.  From the earliest days, Enron rewarded those who moved debt off the books and inflated earnings.  It was driven by booking the deal in this quarter rather than serving the customers for the term of the contract.  The company’s culture was not of innovative ideas–which need not have been, for its idea of trading natural gas did revolutionize the industry–but of creative accounting.

The saddest part about fully understanding the story of Enron is that I believe Jeff Skilling, the company’s former CEO, when he says that he doesn’t think he did anything wrong.  He blames the “classic run on the bank” for the company’s collapse yet conveniently ignores all the accounting misstatements that led to the run in the first place.  He  simply doesn’t get it.  Much like an entity in two dimensions that can never imagine, much less comprehend, a sphere, Jeff Skilling can’t understand what most of us with a common sense of decency see as an obvious wrong.  No amount of Congressional oversight or bureaucratic regulation can compensate for this deficiency.  For people like Skilling, rules are just words to be strictly abided, lacking any context or substance.

The Enron story is a tale of tragic flaws,  but not in the mode of a Shakespearean tragedy.  Shakespeare’s characters are imperfect people undone by their hubris, indecisiveness and ambition, yet the same traits may be turned into a virtue as confidence, thoughtfulness and the drive to excel.

There is no way to positively spin a moral vacuüm.  There is no bright side to moral bankruptcy.  When I think of the filth cultivated at Enron, I don’t feel disbelief as much as despair.  There is an overwhelming dreariness in realizing that we, as society, should be conducting ourselves in much higher standards but we aren’t because of some who simply can’t, not due to their inability to live up to the higher standard, but due to their inability to know any better.

Yet, I can comfortably sleep at night because I have faith, not only in God but also in most people.  Most members of society have developed a sense of right and wrong even if they fail to live up to it.  I can live with myself–and find joy in the every day I do so–because I have surrounded myself with people who have developed it.

*John McCain told his son, a fourth generation McCain to enter the Naval Academy, that so long as you don’t cheat, lie or steal, everything is fair game.  I mostly agree with that, but I think you need to throw in “mislead” and the ancillary “deceive” to remain a distinguished, even if competitive, gentleman.


6 Responses to “A Moral Compass”

  1. 1 Caitlin January 12, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    Well, I think a lot of it has to do with humility. The Golden Rule doesn’t apply when you think you’re better than the other person. I think also people get so swept up in their own competitiveness and need to win that they don’t think about what they’re doing. Which is why I’m morally opposed to unchecked and unsupervised capitalism.

    • 2 joesas January 12, 2010 at 10:43 pm


      I think that’s a great point. Hyper-competitiveness usually results in “win at all cost” attitude. I’d like to think, though, that a definition of a moral compass is that any human trait, whether competitiveness, arrogance or greed, is checked by a conscience. I’d like to think that competition can co-exist with morality.

  2. 3 Tony February 20, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    Speaking of morals – I was listening to Z100 and they had this discussion about what you would do if you walked out of a supermarket with something you didn’t pay for accidently :-)! I think that… Oh wait – I think this is the wrong forum for this :-D!

    Sounds like an interesting page turner though!

    • 4 joesas February 21, 2010 at 5:34 pm


      As much as I talk a good talk about morals, I’m not sure I’ll return those things either. I may just say, “lucky me, they forgot it!”

      Do you distinguish between the store forgetting to ring it up when you pointed it out and when someone intentionally tries to dodge paying for something?

      The book is an excellent read, btw. I finished it in a day–and it’s not a short book.

  1. 1 Distinguishing “Should” from “Could” « The World According to Joe Trackback on October 11, 2010 at 10:49 pm
  2. 2 I Hate Indecent People | The World According to Joe Trackback on May 16, 2016 at 10:17 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1 other follower

Top Rated



January 2010
« Dec   Feb »

%d bloggers like this: